DCPP Taxation by IRS

This is our main tax information forum which deals with topics concerning Canadians living and working in the U.S., U.S. citizens contemplating working in Canada, and all aspects of Canadian and U.S. income tax and related adminstrative issues.

Moderator: Mark T Serbinski CA CPA

Post Reply
jtserbinski
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:10 pm

DCPP Taxation by IRS

Post by jtserbinski »

Hi!

This is a technical question in understanding why a (Canadian) DCPP which is later transferred into a LIRA (then a RRIF), one cannot make withdrawals where *some* of the withwdrawl is tax free (return of capital). I have read this in the forum but don't really understand the technical basis. I am a US resident.

Like many others here, I had a DCPP which was 50% employer/employee funded. For the employee contributions it is treated like a group RRSP, i.e. your/employee contributions are deducted from income and are added to your pension adjustment and limits your private RRSP contributions. I would have expected the employee contributions to be treated by the IRS like a private RRSP contribution. The employer contributons would be 100% taxable.
nelsona
Posts: 18690
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere, man

Post by nelsona »

DCPP's, since they are employer sponsored, and since none of the contributions were considered taxable (in either Canada or US), then none of the DCPP,LIRA, or RRIF will be tax-free upon withdrawal.
This is a considered section 72(w) type pension, not a self-funded RRSP.
After 20 years, I am severely cutting back on responses. Do not ask specifically for my help. There are a few others on this board that can answer most questions. All the best
nelsona
Posts: 18690
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere, man

Post by nelsona »

Rule of thumb is that any pension that can or must be rolled into a LIRA is 100% taxable in US when withdrawn.
After 20 years, I am severely cutting back on responses. Do not ask specifically for my help. There are a few others on this board that can answer most questions. All the best
jtserbinski
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:10 pm

Post by jtserbinski »

Thanks nelsona! I guess the key is employer-sponsored.
nelsona
Posts: 18690
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere, man

Post by nelsona »

Indeed. many cross-border tax people mistakenly thought when 72(w) came out, that this removed the "tax-free" portion of regular RRSPs. It did not, unlerss these were employer-sponsored plans. They did not believe there was a distinction.

However with the release of the last protocol, it was made clear that IRS (and the treaty) make a CLEAR distinction between RRSP's that are employer-sponsored and those that are privately funded (by allowing a deduction for employer plans, and not for private ones).
After 20 years, I am severely cutting back on responses. Do not ask specifically for my help. There are a few others on this board that can answer most questions. All the best
Post Reply