Canadian working in US, family and permanent home in Canada

This is our main tax information forum which deals with topics concerning Canadians living and working in the U.S., U.S. citizens contemplating working in Canada, and all aspects of Canadian and U.S. income tax and related adminstrative issues.

Moderator: Mark T Serbinski CA CPA

Post Reply
stellal
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 2:43 am

Canadian working in US, family and permanent home in Canada

Post by stellal »

Hi,

I worked in US (H1b) last week and my presence in US exceeds 183 days. I usally stay in US on weekdays, and go back Canada on weekends, my wife and child stays in Canada.

I talked with two accountants, one suggested I file us tax with only us source income, not global income because under CANADA-U.S. TAX TREATY TIE BREAKER CLAUSE I tie-break to Canada, another accoutant thinks I should file us tax with my global income.

I am really confused, should I file us tax with us source only income or global incomes?

Thanks a lot.
nelsona
Posts: 18675
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere, man

Post by nelsona »

First, you are stil Cdn resident, so will report all income in canada.

As to how you file in US, you have several choices; your goal should be to reduce US income only to a level you can fully use the credit in canada.

Your options are:

full year 1040, reporting all world income
1040NR, reporting only US-sourced income, and attaching an 8833 expalining you are a Cdn resident.

1040NR using article XXV of the treaty, which I've explained elsewhere.

You choose which ever is easiest besed on lowering your US tax just enough to be les than your Cdn tax on that income.
After 20 years, I am severely cutting back on responses. Do not ask specifically for my help. There are a few others on this board that can answer most questions. All the best
Jospher
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 2:45 am
Location: USA

Post by Jospher »

In June Boardwalk Empire Seasons 1-2 DVD Box Set fell to the bottom of the television barrel- partial nudity. By that Grey's Anatomy box set 1-7'm talking about the Whip Set, a block of lame car Game Of Thrones complete box set that not even Satan could condone. These Game Of Thrones complete Box Set 1 were not only aimed at a completely different demographic than every other G4 show but were worse than any of them. A similarity found in all Sons of Anarchy Seasons 1-4 Sets is that there's always a myriad of women in the picture who can't wait to get paid for what they're doing. one tree hill dvd had to watch in disappointment as I saw my favorite network slowly become MTV. Sons of Anarchy Season 1-4 dvd box set was Video Game Vixens, which was canceled in a heartbeat because even the morons running the channel knew Sons of Anarchy Season 4 box set had created a disaster. The Nurse Jackie dvd was pretty much a beauty pageant of 3D women that appeared in video games. Just Cougar Town dvd was enough to make me want to vomit. Hosted by House M.D dvd the really not-funny annoying guy from Damages dvd Love The 80's the show may have not been on for long, but the sheer fact that Project Runway dvd even existed was bad enough. And don't get me started on Barbed Wire Biscuit. To truly signify their insanity, Warehouse 13 dvd has gone after adult swim with a late-night block that sucks more ass than a toilet seat. Aside from Merlin dvd show that picks up on the TechTV vibe all the Modern Family dvd. Better with You dvd box set is the worst collection of cartoons I've ever seen. I'd even take Law and Order Special Victims Unit dvd show ever over this pile. Dead Like Me dvd has survived simply because anime works on Cartoon Network. And while Brothers and Sisters dvd may have the biggest anime titles on it, Supernatural dvd has some of the worst. To be fair The Best Of Soul Train dvd box set has sucked going back to the TechTV days. 30 Rock dvd's too bad that's the one G4 show not affected by change.
stellal
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 2:43 am

Post by stellal »

Nelson, thanks for your reply. I prepared to file 1040NR and form 8833 using article iv (residency).

I am concerned with the fact that I already applied I-140 and approved, have not filed I-485 yet, I am wondering whether that affect my canadian residency.

Thanks for your help.
nelsona
Posts: 18675
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere, man

Post by nelsona »

That should not make a difernce, but would have been something useful to mention.
After 20 years, I am severely cutting back on responses. Do not ask specifically for my help. There are a few others on this board that can answer most questions. All the best
stellal
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 2:43 am

Post by stellal »

Nelson, thanks for your reply. I still have a few questions.

1. Do I need file form 8938, I already mailed it out. have not done Fbar, do I need to do fbar?

2. I am preparing my canadian tax return, as my income is from us, can I claim the travelling expense (like lodging) since lodging is only for the employment (I rent a room and stayed there only when I work in us) ?

Thanks a lot.
nelsona
Posts: 18675
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere, man

Post by nelsona »

If you met SPT, and are using the treaty to avoid filing 1040, then you need to file FBAR.

2. No.
After 20 years, I am severely cutting back on responses. Do not ask specifically for my help. There are a few others on this board that can answer most questions. All the best
mackayr
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:37 pm

Post by mackayr »

I came across this post looking into a similar matter. My situation is a fellow who works 2 weeks in the US, lives one week in Canada, throughout the year. He filed a 1040NR (married filing separately) each year, and claimed non-residence using 8833. I now understand (after reading this thread) that he should have filed FBAR and 8938 even though he was a non-resident under treaty.

For FBAR, he's way over the $10k, so we'll need to back file those (6 years?).

For 8938, even though he meets the SPT, he's a bonafide resident of Canada (Canadian citizen, wife is Canadian citizen, permanent home in Canada, wife is in Canada for 320+ days each year).

Is his threshold for filing 8938 $200,000?

What about the 8891? I can't find where this would be required for a treaty non-resident. In other words, I cannot see any instructions that would suggest that treaty non-residents would be subject to filing the 8891.

Is he exempt from filing 8891?

I expect that if he had not taken the non-resident position (8833/treaty), then he WOULD be required to file the 8891. Is this correct?

Thanks in advance for any insights.
Post Reply