Private Letter Rulings use on Excluding RRSP holdings
Moderator: Mark T Serbinski CA CPA
Private Letter Rulings use on Excluding RRSP holdings
I decided to enter the OVDI program with RRSP and non-RRSP accounts.
My accountant recommended a lawyer to file a PLR so all RRSP accounts will be excluded from penalty. The legal costs for that is north of $10,000.
Does anyone have experience in having their RRSP excluded with or without a PLR?
thanks!
My accountant recommended a lawyer to file a PLR so all RRSP accounts will be excluded from penalty. The legal costs for that is north of $10,000.
Does anyone have experience in having their RRSP excluded with or without a PLR?
thanks!
By filing 8891 and TDF forms for past six years I know of NO ONE that has had any penalty, tax, or fine on non-reported RRSP.
You are wasting your money with a PLR.
You are wasting your money with a PLR.
After 20 years, I am severely cutting back on responses. Do not ask specifically for my help. There are a few others on this board that can answer most questions. All the best
I did RRSP and non-RRSP with OVDI 2011. No idea what outcome would be...
Within OVDI, you may ask to have RRSP not included for base penalty -- that means, you will file f8891 and make election from 2003 or the year that you have to report RRSP undistributed income without an election for deferral.
I do not see you need any lawyer's help --- if it can be done yourself clean/complete.
Within OVDI, you may ask to have RRSP not included for base penalty -- that means, you will file f8891 and make election from 2003 or the year that you have to report RRSP undistributed income without an election for deferral.
I do not see you need any lawyer's help --- if it can be done yourself clean/complete.
nelsona,
it is an complicated issue when a taxpayer has both non-RRSP and RRSP. he/she can not just back file 6 years of RRSP with FBAR and f8891 -- that he/she has to deal with non-RRSP problem.
I agree that is wasting money to hire a lawyer for PLR, i would just send all to OVDI, and ask for consideration f8891 back filing within OVDI. If IRS wants a taxpayer to waive statute of limitation of 3 year/6 years FBAR, that means the taxpayer should have a benefit (due process ?) to back file f8891 to make this election -- thus, no tax due for RRSP and then no penalty should be applied to RRSP.
thank you Nelsona, i wish I had known you/this forum many yaers ago...
but anyway, if i could get off the penalty on my RRSP, i will send you a case of beer to cheer my win.
it is an complicated issue when a taxpayer has both non-RRSP and RRSP. he/she can not just back file 6 years of RRSP with FBAR and f8891 -- that he/she has to deal with non-RRSP problem.
I agree that is wasting money to hire a lawyer for PLR, i would just send all to OVDI, and ask for consideration f8891 back filing within OVDI. If IRS wants a taxpayer to waive statute of limitation of 3 year/6 years FBAR, that means the taxpayer should have a benefit (due process ?) to back file f8891 to make this election -- thus, no tax due for RRSP and then no penalty should be applied to RRSP.
thank you Nelsona, i wish I had known you/this forum many yaers ago...
but anyway, if i could get off the penalty on my RRSP, i will send you a case of beer to cheer my win.
Remember, the reason you are in OVDI is not because your forgot to file your RRSP forms, or forgot to file your TDFs or even forgot to file your return.
You are in OVDI because you did not report INCOME of your fiiled tax return, and pay tax on it. That is under-reporting, and the fact that it was foreign makes it worse.
US citizens in canada are almost NEVER taxable on their Cdn income, so OVDI does not apply to them, especially if they never filed a tax return.
Only those Cdns who lived in US and failed to report income are subject to OVDI, and only on non-RRSP income.
Our poster is already in OVDI, so he is dealing with the non-RRSP. His RRSP handling is cut-and-dried. back-file and be done with it, no tax, no penalty.
You are in OVDI because you did not report INCOME of your fiiled tax return, and pay tax on it. That is under-reporting, and the fact that it was foreign makes it worse.
US citizens in canada are almost NEVER taxable on their Cdn income, so OVDI does not apply to them, especially if they never filed a tax return.
Only those Cdns who lived in US and failed to report income are subject to OVDI, and only on non-RRSP income.
Our poster is already in OVDI, so he is dealing with the non-RRSP. His RRSP handling is cut-and-dried. back-file and be done with it, no tax, no penalty.
After 20 years, I am severely cutting back on responses. Do not ask specifically for my help. There are a few others on this board that can answer most questions. All the best
ikeaidea,
no words yet from IRS, i sent it all in OVDI because of non-RRSP issue. if it is pure RRSP issue, filing f1040x with f8891 back for 6 years without PRL seems okay... but it won't work if non-RRSP is involved. OVDI 2011 covers 2003 to 2010, and if a taxpayer has both RRSP and non-RRSP problem (no election and under report), then he has to go through OVDI, because if he sent RRSP outside OVDI, that would be for 6 years, then with his problem on non-RRSP, that would be from 2003 --- that will cause problem with RRSP as he has made election (say on 2005 back 6 years), then for 2003 and 2004 these two years would be problem for RRSP -- as he has waived the statute of limitation --back as far as to 2003. With these two years of RRSP no tax deferral election (as he has made on 2005), the RRSP will have to be included in FBAR penalty base.
no words yet from IRS, i sent it all in OVDI because of non-RRSP issue. if it is pure RRSP issue, filing f1040x with f8891 back for 6 years without PRL seems okay... but it won't work if non-RRSP is involved. OVDI 2011 covers 2003 to 2010, and if a taxpayer has both RRSP and non-RRSP problem (no election and under report), then he has to go through OVDI, because if he sent RRSP outside OVDI, that would be for 6 years, then with his problem on non-RRSP, that would be from 2003 --- that will cause problem with RRSP as he has made election (say on 2005 back 6 years), then for 2003 and 2004 these two years would be problem for RRSP -- as he has waived the statute of limitation --back as far as to 2003. With these two years of RRSP no tax deferral election (as he has made on 2005), the RRSP will have to be included in FBAR penalty base.
This is only if he filed incorrectly. If one never filed (becasue living in canada) OVDI is not needed. Simple 3/6 year filing is sufficent.
After 20 years, I am severely cutting back on responses. Do not ask specifically for my help. There are a few others on this board that can answer most questions. All the best
Indeed. I was speaking more generally, since very few Cdns living 'forget' to report all their taxes, while many were unaware of TDF and 8891.
After 20 years, I am severely cutting back on responses. Do not ask specifically for my help. There are a few others on this board that can answer most questions. All the best
I disagree. there has benn no evidence of that regarding RRSPs, proabably because theiRS itsekf hs been all over the map on RRSPs in the past decade.
After 20 years, I am severely cutting back on responses. Do not ask specifically for my help. There are a few others on this board that can answer most questions. All the best
From the legal point of view, IRS should let a taxpayer off the RRSP FBAR penalty even if he/she has non-RRSP non-compliance.
in OVDI, a taxpayer has to sign to waive tax assessment/FBAR statute limitation -- all the way back to 2003. That is to allow IRS to get the tax owed as well FBAR penalty (in OVDI that is 5%, 12.5% and 25%) on the max from 2003 to 2010. My view of due process on this issue, the taxpayer should also entitle to file f8891 because these years are open for amending -- it should not be only for IRS but also to the taxpayer.
So, there is a hope that RRSP in OVDI will be off the penalty.
A pure RRSP problem is smiple -- no PRL/no OVDI.
in OVDI, a taxpayer has to sign to waive tax assessment/FBAR statute limitation -- all the way back to 2003. That is to allow IRS to get the tax owed as well FBAR penalty (in OVDI that is 5%, 12.5% and 25%) on the max from 2003 to 2010. My view of due process on this issue, the taxpayer should also entitle to file f8891 because these years are open for amending -- it should not be only for IRS but also to the taxpayer.
So, there is a hope that RRSP in OVDI will be off the penalty.
A pure RRSP problem is smiple -- no PRL/no OVDI.