Here is some background: Husband works in the U.S., wife works in Canada, for the past several years and for now. Don't expect to change in near future. Several years ago, when the husband learnt to file U.S. tax, he applied an ITIN for the wife, aka, treating nonresident wife as a U.S. resident. So the first year, they filed married filling jointly. Since it's too much work, later years, he only filed married filling separately. Since the wife stayed in Canada without U.S. income, she didn't file anything.
The issue: According to IRS, once made the choice to be treated as a U.S. resident for federal income tax and withholding purposes, it applies to all later years unless suspended or ended in one of the ways shown below:
Revocation by either spouse
Death of either spouse
Legal separation
Inadequate records
Apparently, we didn't write to revoke the choice, and in the past few years, only the husband filed the U.S. tax. So is the wife overdue U.S. filing for the past few years? (Wife shouldn't have any tax overdue, as all her income comes from Canada and Canada tax is higher than U.S.) Would there be any penalties? What should we do now?
Making the choice to treat nonresident spouse as a resident
Moderator: Mark T Serbinski CA CPA
Re: Making the choice to treat nonresident spouse as a resident
Nelsona, where are you? Your insight, please
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2022 4:56 am
Re: Making the choice to treat nonresident spouse as a resident
For the visa of the Turkish is very easy to all the setup into the Turkish to have mind for the tour over there. The president of the turkey has been issued that is www.moverspackers.ae legit for the turkey generation and for the school at there.
Re: Making the choice to treat nonresident spouse as a resident
Was there something unsatisfactory with ND's answer. That is what 9100 is for.
There is also a Table 1-1 in IRS Pub, 54, but I suspect that would have had to have been invoked the year you fisrt decided to "un-elect". Again, 9100.
There is also a Table 1-1 in IRS Pub, 54, but I suspect that would have had to have been invoked the year you fisrt decided to "un-elect". Again, 9100.
nelsona non grata. Non pro. Please Search previous posts, no situation is unique as you might think. Happy Browsing