Inheritance
Moderator: Mark T Serbinski CA CPA
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 11:43 am
Inheritance
There is no inheritance tax in Canada, correct? When my husband and I move to the U.S., and at some point receive inheritance from his parents in Canada, will we be taxed on that?
Neither US nor canada have inheritance tax.
The US has estate tax, which taxes the estate. An estate entirely in canada would not be subject to US estate tax.
Canada has deemed disposition on death, which kicks in when they kick off. So any investments held at time of death are 'sold' and rebought, with tax possibly owing on the triggered capital gains, charged to the estate.
<i>nelsona non grata... and non pro</i>
The US has estate tax, which taxes the estate. An estate entirely in canada would not be subject to US estate tax.
Canada has deemed disposition on death, which kicks in when they kick off. So any investments held at time of death are 'sold' and rebought, with tax possibly owing on the triggered capital gains, charged to the estate.
<i>nelsona non grata... and non pro</i>
While the <i>caveat</i> about a foreign executor is good, proposing trusts as the solution is not advisable.
First, the costs of setting up and maintaining such a trust for what seems like a 'normal' estate would FAR outstrip the cost of the correct solution, which would be to <u>name a Canadian executor</u>.
Second, it is never a good idea to have a family member -- not to mention a primary beneficiary -- as executor.
Third, in this particular case, as your huisband would be establishing a US presence, this would now subject him to immediate and burdensome IRS reporting because of his involvement in, and eventual benefit from, a foreign trust.
If his family has made him the executor, it is time to correct this, not set up a trust.
<i>nelsona non grata... and non pro</i>
First, the costs of setting up and maintaining such a trust for what seems like a 'normal' estate would FAR outstrip the cost of the correct solution, which would be to <u>name a Canadian executor</u>.
Second, it is never a good idea to have a family member -- not to mention a primary beneficiary -- as executor.
Third, in this particular case, as your huisband would be establishing a US presence, this would now subject him to immediate and burdensome IRS reporting because of his involvement in, and eventual benefit from, a foreign trust.
If his family has made him the executor, it is time to correct this, not set up a trust.
<i>nelsona non grata... and non pro</i>
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 11:43 am
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by nelsona</i>
While the <i>caveat</i> about a foreign executor is good, proposing trusts as the solution is not advisable.
First, the costs of setting up and maintaining such a trust for what seems like a 'normal' estate would FAR outstrip the cost of the correct solution, which would be to <u>name a Canadian executor</u>.
Second, it is never a good idea to have a family member -- not to mention a primary beneficiary -- as executor.
Third, in this particular case, as your huisband would be establishing a US presence, this would now subject him to immediate and burdensome IRS reporting because of his involvement in, and eventual benefit from, a foreign trust.
If his family has made him the executor, it is time to correct this, not set up a trust.
<i>nelsona non grata... and non pro</i>
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
I have one more question.
My husband is currently one of the executors, along with his brother. Are you saying all this extra IRS reporting would result from his being an executor, or his being a beneficiary? If he's not an executor, would there still be a large problem?
Thanks.
While the <i>caveat</i> about a foreign executor is good, proposing trusts as the solution is not advisable.
First, the costs of setting up and maintaining such a trust for what seems like a 'normal' estate would FAR outstrip the cost of the correct solution, which would be to <u>name a Canadian executor</u>.
Second, it is never a good idea to have a family member -- not to mention a primary beneficiary -- as executor.
Third, in this particular case, as your huisband would be establishing a US presence, this would now subject him to immediate and burdensome IRS reporting because of his involvement in, and eventual benefit from, a foreign trust.
If his family has made him the executor, it is time to correct this, not set up a trust.
<i>nelsona non grata... and non pro</i>
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
I have one more question.
My husband is currently one of the executors, along with his brother. Are you saying all this extra IRS reporting would result from his being an executor, or his being a beneficiary? If he's not an executor, would there still be a large problem?
Thanks.
But once in US, until he renounces executorship, since he is also a beneficiary, he would be subject to reporting and fines for failure to report.
Like I said, lo these many days ago, forget the executorship (hos brother should find someone else too) in favour of a trusted (local) friend.
<i>nelsona non grata... and non pro</i>
Like I said, lo these many days ago, forget the executorship (hos brother should find someone else too) in favour of a trusted (local) friend.
<i>nelsona non grata... and non pro</i>