Proof of mailing

This is our main tax information forum which deals with topics concerning Canadians living and working in the U.S., U.S. citizens contemplating working in Canada, and all aspects of Canadian and U.S. income tax and related adminstrative issues.

Moderator: Mark T Serbinski CA CPA

Post Reply
jamesbob1
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 12:29 pm

Proof of mailing

Post by jamesbob1 »

I have a possible issue with a lost form; it's been several months of waiting for answers from the IRS, and the answer will affect my next year's filing. I did file using Canadian registered mail, and I have the stamped receipt. According to the following from the IRS, a registered or certified mail receipt is the only evidence of proof of mailing:

§301.7502-1 Timely mailing of documents and payments treated as timely filing and paying.
* * * * *

(e) * * * (1) * * * Other than direct proof of actual delivery, proof of proper use of registered or certified mail is the exclusive means to establish prima facie evidence of delivery of a document to the agency, officer, or office with which the document is required to be filed. No other evidence of a postmark or of mailing will be prima facie evidence of delivery or raise a presumption that the document was delivered.

* * * * *


I have read elsewhere that a foreign postmark is legitmate for IRS purposes. However, this does not seem to address foreign registered mail. For proof of mailing, is Canadian registered mail regarded by the IRS as the same as US registered mail? Will a Canadian registered mail receipt offer the same proof of mailing to the IRS? It's a rather important question in my case....
nelsona
Posts: 18677
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere, man

Post by nelsona »

Cdn certified mail is fine.
What form are we talking about?
After 20 years, I am severely cutting back on responses. Do not ask specifically for my help. There are a few others on this board that can answer most questions. All the best
jamesbob1
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 12:29 pm

Post by jamesbob1 »

Thanks Nelson. Do you have a reference for this (or something to point me to)? It's hard to imagine that the IRS would recognize a registered mail receipt from anywhere in the world, or that it would have legal effect, but maybe I am wrong. I'm sensitive about the form in question; I'll just say that it does not appear on any of the normal systems -- so calling them does no good -- and the only way to correspond is by letter (and is very slow).
cullen
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 1:34 am
Location: Greenville SC

Post by cullen »

Revenue Ruling 2002-23

I have the text on my website
http://www.traveltax.com/Documents/Lett ... 905202.pdf
Joe
cullen
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 1:34 am
Location: Greenville SC

Post by cullen »

Joe
jamesbob1
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 12:29 pm

Post by jamesbob1 »

Thanks Joseph. Perhaps I'm putting too fine of a point on it, but I read this ruling as addressing timely filing only, as opposed to proof of mailing. From the latter perspective, I have not been able to find anything that supports (or dismisses) international registered mailing as evidence of proof of mailing. However, I have found some documentation that points to a Hague convention ruling that seems to establish some legality around intnernational registered mail. That said, I suppose the IRS can make up whatever rule it wants.
nelsona
Posts: 18677
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere, man

Post by nelsona »

I think you are getting a little carried away.

You have proof that you mailed *something* to the IRS. You hae a copy of wha tyou sent.

Since they presuamably have nothing. You win. Resend them the information, along with prrof of the earlier delivery and rest easy.
After 20 years, I am severely cutting back on responses. Do not ask specifically for my help. There are a few others on this board that can answer most questions. All the best
cullen
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 1:34 am
Location: Greenville SC

Post by cullen »

Nelson is right about the documentation.

Additionally, in the event that any individual or department in the IRS wishes to argue your filing, the issue can be taken to appeals or referred to the Taxpayer Advocate which is akin to the new Canadian Taxpayers Ombudsman's office. Taxpayers have wide latitutde in dealing with the IRS and can request that their positions be heard at different administrative levels before going to tax court. None of this requires an attorney. Any CPA or Enrolled Agent like myself can represent a taxpayer, OR the taxpayer can represent themselves.
Joe
jamesbob1
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 12:29 pm

Post by jamesbob1 »

I think you are both right. Thanks for the additional info and perspective. I also took another look at the meaning of "prima facie, " which I somewhat misread as "exclusive."

Happy New Year!
Post Reply