Canadian TN commuting to US - how to file next year?

This is our main tax information forum which deals with topics concerning Canadians living and working in the U.S., U.S. citizens contemplating working in Canada, and all aspects of Canadian and U.S. income tax and related adminstrative issues.

Moderator: Mark T Serbinski CA CPA

Post Reply
rg1495
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:54 pm

Post by rg1495 »

How do you notify the IRS that you are filing 1040 NR but using Article XXV(4) ? I have been filing simple 1040NR for the last 5 years......wouldn't the IRS smell something fishy when I do it the other way this year......I could possibly save atleast 3 to 4K in taxes this year.......does it make sense to go back and amend the taxes for those years? How old is this Article XXV
nelsona
Posts: 18366
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere, man

Post by nelsona »

The treaty clause has been around for at least 20 years. You would notify them on form 8833

I think you can only go back 3 or 4 years.

Remember though that any redcution in US tax will be taken by Canada, so you wil have to ammend these returns as well.
nelsona non grata. Non pro. Please Search previous posts, no situation is unique as you might think. Happy Browsing :D
rg1495
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:54 pm

Post by rg1495 »

if I amend my canadian taxes, can I go back and invest in RRSP's for those years? If not, whatever I save on US taxes, I will end up paying to Canada. So, is there any real advantage in amending the taxes for previous years?
nelsona
Posts: 18366
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere, man

Post by nelsona »

You will not be able to make retroactive RRSP contributions, of course. Some make the contributions but don't claim the deduction. These could be claimed.

In your case, the only advantage is that your taxes would be going to Canada instead of US.

Lot of paperwork just for that privilege.

Just learn to do better...
nelsona non grata. Non pro. Please Search previous posts, no situation is unique as you might think. Happy Browsing :D
rg1495
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:54 pm

Post by rg1495 »

Thanks Nelsona...this is the link to form 8833
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f8833.pdf

This form requires a US address.....As a canadian resident, how do I give a US address?....I am a canadian citizen and commute to work on H1....u think I can still use this treaty?

thanks
telly1
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:42 pm

Post by telly1 »

nelsona, if my husband's eff. tax rate is actually lower using the NR can I file his NR using that tax rate (15.1%) (i.e. a regular NR) instead of the eff. tax rate determined from the pro forma (15.26%) but use the pro forma eff. tax rate for my NR? In other words, can I claim the treaty and my husband not even though we use the 1040 MFJ to determine my eff. tax rate?
nelsona
Posts: 18366
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere, man

Post by nelsona »

I don't understand your question.
nelsona non grata. Non pro. Please Search previous posts, no situation is unique as you might think. Happy Browsing :D
telly1
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:42 pm

Post by telly1 »

Sorry nelsona.
What I meant was, using the pro-forma 1040 (MFJ) I arrived at an effective tax rate of 15.26%. When I calculated our individual tax rates using the 1040NR method, I got 17.3% for me and 15.1% for my husband.
It seems it's more beneficial to use the pro forma method (w/ treaty exemption) for me but just simply use the regular 1040NR for my husband. Is it ok to do this?
nelsona
Posts: 18366
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere, man

Post by nelsona »

Yu are each filing your own 1040NR. You are simply using the treaty provision to calculate your tax rate, and he is not.
nelsona non grata. Non pro. Please Search previous posts, no situation is unique as you might think. Happy Browsing :D
telly1
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:42 pm

Post by telly1 »

Thanks nelsona. I just wanted to make sure it's "ok" to do that.
rg1495
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:54 pm

Post by rg1495 »

Nelsona.......I asked this question earlier but never got a reply.......

Is this the form we have to use for the treaty?
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f8833.pdf

This form requires a US address.....As a canadian resident, how do I give a US address?....I am a canadian citizen and commute to work on H1....u think I can still use this treaty?

thanks for all your help.
nelsona
Posts: 18366
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere, man

Post by nelsona »

Simply for adding it to this post, I'll let you come to your own conclusion.

NO PIGGYBACKING PLEASE.
nelsona non grata. Non pro. Please Search previous posts, no situation is unique as you might think. Happy Browsing :D
rg1495
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:54 pm

Post by rg1495 »

I am sorry but I don't understand what you mean Nelsona. Form 8833 requires a US address, can I still use it to take advantage of Article XXV?
nelsona
Posts: 18366
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere, man

Post by nelsona »

Sigh.

The form does NOT require a US address. It has a space for both a foreign and US one.

Pick one.
nelsona non grata. Non pro. Please Search previous posts, no situation is unique as you might think. Happy Browsing :D
telly1
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:42 pm

Post by telly1 »

nelsona,

I am using the pro forma 1040 MFJ method (I hadn't had a chance to finish this up until now) to calculate the eff. tax rate and use that on the NR. Previously I had come up with a eff. tax rate of 15.26% but I realized that I hadn't entered any information for foreign taxes paid in Canada on my husband's Canadian income (my husband had income both in US and Canada). I'm using TurboTax but am a little confused. What I did was enter the amount of tax paid in Canada (including CPP & EI?) in the foreign taxes paid section as a credit (simplified foreign tax credit election) using "general limitation income". The problem is, this section asks me for his foreign income but I have already entered this information in the income section (wages and salary).

Can you direct me to where I am going wrong? I'd really appreciate it!
Post Reply