New guidance just issued by the IRS for expatriates/renunciants:
http://www.irs.gov/irb/2009-45_IRB/ar10.html
Renunciation
Moderator: Mark T Serbinski CA CPA
I find the notion of a Cdn resident renouncing US citizenship so foolish, that I won't even entertain any questions on it. Free country right?
It's like the kid who gets beat up every day at school for his lunch money standing up and announcing that he is boycotting the cafeteria.
It's like the kid who gets beat up every day at school for his lunch money standing up and announcing that he is boycotting the cafeteria.
After 20 years, I am severely cutting back on responses. Do not ask specifically for my help. There are a few others on this board that can answer most questions. All the best
[quote="nelsona"]I find the notion of a Cdn resident renouncing US citizenship so foolish, that I won't even entertain any questions on it. Free country right?
It's like the kid who gets beat up every day at school for his lunch money standing up and announcing that he is boycotting the cafeteria.[/quote]
Yawn. Does any informed person have a factual answer to my question or a link to a source that covers the matter in ordinary English rather than legalese?
It's like the kid who gets beat up every day at school for his lunch money standing up and announcing that he is boycotting the cafeteria.[/quote]
Yawn. Does any informed person have a factual answer to my question or a link to a source that covers the matter in ordinary English rather than legalese?
I'll offer a reply because I think it's a valid question. As far as I'm aware, there is no guidance on how RRSPs are treated at renunciation. However, the treaty allows you defer income until start to withdraw it. As such, at the moment someone expatriates, they are still in the "deferred" category.
If the IRS took an aggressive position, they could attempt to claim you owe back taxes on the otherwise deferred income (which is now, presumably, not deferred). However, I suspect they would need to pass some legislation to that effect, and they would also have to deal with the treaty. After all, at the moment someone renounces (assuming they met the threshold and filing conditions), they no longer have any obligations to the IRS for future events -- such as withdrawals from an RRSP. Just my interpretation...
If the IRS took an aggressive position, they could attempt to claim you owe back taxes on the otherwise deferred income (which is now, presumably, not deferred). However, I suspect they would need to pass some legislation to that effect, and they would also have to deal with the treaty. After all, at the moment someone renounces (assuming they met the threshold and filing conditions), they no longer have any obligations to the IRS for future events -- such as withdrawals from an RRSP. Just my interpretation...