Just found out - am I bankrupt now?
Moderator: Mark T Serbinski CA CPA
-
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 12:15 am
the children would need to be registered as USC born abroad.
http://toronto.usconsulate.gov/service/ ... broad.html
If your child was born on or after 11/14/86, and only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of the child's birth, the child may have acquired U.S. citizenship at birth if the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the USA for periods totaling five years prior to the child's birth, at least two of which were after their 14th birthday.
but it doesn't sound like, based on your posts, that you meet the above criteria for presence.
Besides this child credit, being able to readily work in the US is the only financial benefit of being a USC that I have seen. And possibly eligible for medicade if a person worked there long enough, and moved back to the US.
The practical deterrents (reporting and taxation) to owning a TFSA, RESP and CDN mutual funds are all financial drawbacks. The reporting and taxation of these for compliant USC in Canada were not addressed in the FATCA intergovenmental agreement. Perhaps they could be with a repening of the tax treaty? Then USC resident in Canada could be more on par with USC living in the US who can buy US mutual funds, contribute to Roth IRAs and use 529 plans for tax free education savings.
http://toronto.usconsulate.gov/service/ ... broad.html
If your child was born on or after 11/14/86, and only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of the child's birth, the child may have acquired U.S. citizenship at birth if the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the USA for periods totaling five years prior to the child's birth, at least two of which were after their 14th birthday.
but it doesn't sound like, based on your posts, that you meet the above criteria for presence.
Besides this child credit, being able to readily work in the US is the only financial benefit of being a USC that I have seen. And possibly eligible for medicade if a person worked there long enough, and moved back to the US.
The practical deterrents (reporting and taxation) to owning a TFSA, RESP and CDN mutual funds are all financial drawbacks. The reporting and taxation of these for compliant USC in Canada were not addressed in the FATCA intergovenmental agreement. Perhaps they could be with a repening of the tax treaty? Then USC resident in Canada could be more on par with USC living in the US who can buy US mutual funds, contribute to Roth IRAs and use 529 plans for tax free education savings.
no-pro
If you can prove that you relinquished your US citizenship sometime in the past, you may escape the clutches of the IRS without becoming compliant, but be aware that renouncing only rids you of your US citizenship for immigration purposes, not for taxation. If you file 3 years of back taxes and forms, you may become compliant but would have to continue filing annually. If you renounce, you have to file form 8854 with your final tax return, and demonstrate that you have filed for the previous 5 years. You also have to report your net worth. If this is more than $2M (US), you are subject to an "exit tax".
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 7:01 pm
"I also remember an Obama program from ?2009? which gave a similar credit; I think it's goal was to stimulate the economy after the stock market crash. Anyway, these typically do not offset the headache, but they are some small benefits."
Please don't give Obama any credit for this. It was the Bush stimulus in 2008 - I got a nice cheque from the IRS that year. Obama thinks that anyone with foreign income is a 1%er who is trying to hide something.
Please don't give Obama any credit for this. It was the Bush stimulus in 2008 - I got a nice cheque from the IRS that year. Obama thinks that anyone with foreign income is a 1%er who is trying to hide something.