Determining the Creation of a Permanent Establishment in US

This is our main tax information forum which deals with topics concerning Canadians living and working in the U.S., U.S. citizens contemplating working in Canada, and all aspects of Canadian and U.S. income tax and related adminstrative issues.

Moderator: Mark T Serbinski CA CPA

Post Reply
bobfranklin
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 10:25 am

Determining the Creation of a Permanent Establishment in US

Post by bobfranklin »

Hi all,

I have done a review of the forums but don't see my specific issue coming up with effect to permanent establishments. I am therefore hoping for some assistance!

Nearly everyone who is asking about whether they've established a PE in the US is a sole proprietor with a single client in the US. I think my situation is different. I'm a Canadian citizen, with no US visa status. I married my wife last year in the US and therefore spent 250 days in the doing wedding prep, etc. I am the 100% owner of a CCPC. The business provides consulting services remotely for a range of clients. Over 2013 only about 3 clients (of approx 20) were US-based, while the rest were based around the world.

Based on the above, I did pass the test of being in the US for over 183 days. However, the % of income that the business generated because of my efforts during my time in the US was only about 35%, given that I use many subcontractors based in Canada, the UK, Australia, etc. I also did not spend substantial time (obviously) working for any single client in 2013.

For this reason, i do not believe I've actually created a PE in the US given that 9a in the treaty states that you have to have been resident for over 183 AND over 50% of the revenue during that period must have been generated in the US.

Could you please confirm if I'm correct? The one clause that I do not fully understand is the following:

[i]5. A person acting in a Contracting State on behalf of a resident of the other Contracting State — other than an agent of an independent status to whom paragraph 7 applies — shall be deemed to be a permanent establishment in the first-mentioned State if such person has, and habitually exercises in that State, an authority to conclude contracts in the name of the resident.
[/i]

Thank you very much for your input.

Bob
nelsona
Posts: 18688
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere, man

Post by nelsona »

I believe your conclusion is correct.
After 20 years, I am severely cutting back on responses. Do not ask specifically for my help. There are a few others on this board that can answer most questions. All the best
Post Reply