I assume form T2062 and T2062A were completed on sale and certificate of compliance issued?
Only the capital gain and tax withheld on T2062 goes on the T1 non-resident return. Form 776 is left completely blank on the non-resident return.
You are over thinking this. Think about it this way. You ...
Search found 94 matches
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 1:02 am
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Non resident selling rental property Section 216 return for rent + T1 for cap gains
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3456
- Tue May 02, 2017 12:35 am
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Ontario to USA (74days) to Quebe within 2016 - residency ?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 10921
- Mon May 01, 2017 3:47 pm
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Ontario to USA (74days) to Quebe within 2016 - residency ?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 10921
Either you did not read my post carefully or you are missing my point. The poster in question left in April. I said he could only be considered a resident of the US IF he stayed in the US for the rest of the year, and he did not. So, I’m in agreement with you, he was never considered a US resident, but was a factual resident of Canada.
I realize the treaty tie-breaker rules can’t be applied unless he’s also a resident of the US. IF he stayed in the US for the rest of the year after his arrival in April, he would have met the SPT that year. So, IF he had a house back in Canada he would be considered a resident of both Canada AND the US at the same time and the treaty tie breaker rules WOULD have to be applied (this is why I said “He did not mention if he kept a home in Canada or was just renting before he leftâ€). I assumed this would be understood by this comment.
If he did have a house back in Canada, he would tie the first test and move on to the second test (economic interests). Because he brought his family with him and works there, he no longer has any primary ties to Canada and would almost certainly be considered a deemed non-resident of Canada.
If he did NOT have a home back in Canada, then he would simply be an emigrant. Would you not agree that this is how this scenario would have played out IF he stayed in the US the rest of the year?
I realize the treaty tie-breaker rules can’t be applied unless he’s also a resident of the US. IF he stayed in the US for the rest of the year after his arrival in April, he would have met the SPT that year. So, IF he had a house back in Canada he would be considered a resident of both Canada AND the US at the same time and the treaty tie breaker rules WOULD have to be applied (this is why I said “He did not mention if he kept a home in Canada or was just renting before he leftâ€). I assumed this would be understood by this comment.
If he did have a house back in Canada, he would tie the first test and move on to the second test (economic interests). Because he brought his family with him and works there, he no longer has any primary ties to Canada and would almost certainly be considered a deemed non-resident of Canada.
If he did NOT have a home back in Canada, then he would simply be an emigrant. Would you not agree that this is how this scenario would have played out IF he stayed in the US the rest of the year?
- Mon May 01, 2017 11:44 am
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Ontario to USA (74days) to Quebe within 2016 - residency ?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 10921
A very similar situation happened to me with one of my client's but over two years, not the same calendar year.
A couple moved to the US when the husband got a 3-4 year work contract. They had every intention of staying in the US, so I prepared them for a proper departure. Then the husband's mom ...
A couple moved to the US when the husband got a 3-4 year work contract. They had every intention of staying in the US, so I prepared them for a proper departure. Then the husband's mom ...
- Mon May 01, 2017 11:36 am
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Ontario to USA (74days) to Quebe within 2016 - residency ?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 10921
This was poorly worded. By in hindsight, I meant that on the DAY he took his family to the US, started working, presumably started renting in the US (not living in temporary housing) he DID establish ties in the US. Enough ties to be considered a resident of the US IF he stayed there the rest of the ...
- Mon May 01, 2017 9:47 am
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Foreign property insurance policy included in T1135?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2431
- Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:08 pm
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Specific reporting costs in T1135
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7373
- Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:05 pm
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Ontario to USA (74days) to Quebe within 2016 - residency ?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 10921
- Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:54 am
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Choosing deemed resident or non-resident
- Replies: 25
- Views: 15741
- Wed Apr 26, 2017 11:24 pm
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Choosing deemed resident or non-resident
- Replies: 25
- Views: 15741
- Wed Apr 26, 2017 11:16 pm
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Choosing deemed resident or non-resident
- Replies: 25
- Views: 15741
- Wed Apr 26, 2017 2:47 pm
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Choosing deemed resident or non-resident
- Replies: 25
- Views: 15741
- Wed Apr 26, 2017 2:32 pm
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Choosing deemed resident or non-resident
- Replies: 25
- Views: 15741
- Wed Apr 26, 2017 2:27 pm
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Choosing deemed resident or non-resident
- Replies: 25
- Views: 15741
- Wed Apr 26, 2017 2:19 pm
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Choosing deemed resident or non-resident
- Replies: 25
- Views: 15741
1) yes
2) yes, and yes Schedule 7 is still required
3) Yes T1243 is required for non-registered investments deemed to be disposed. T1161 is also required if total value of all applicable assets is over $25K. Keep in mind that technically you are supposed to even put personal use property, such as ...
2) yes, and yes Schedule 7 is still required
3) Yes T1243 is required for non-registered investments deemed to be disposed. T1161 is also required if total value of all applicable assets is over $25K. Keep in mind that technically you are supposed to even put personal use property, such as ...