I think you are both right. Thanks for the additional info and perspective. I also took another look at the meaning of "prima facie, " which I somewhat misread as "exclusive."
Happy New Year!
Search found 4 matches
- Mon Dec 31, 2007 6:26 pm
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Proof of mailing
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6384
- Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:59 pm
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Proof of mailing
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6384
Thanks Joseph. Perhaps I'm putting too fine of a point on it, but I read this ruling as addressing timely filing only, as opposed to proof of mailing. From the latter perspective, I have not been able to find anything that supports (or dismisses) international registered mailing as evidence of proof...
- Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:37 pm
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Proof of mailing
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6384
Thanks Nelson. Do you have a reference for this (or something to point me to)? It's hard to imagine that the IRS would recognize a registered mail receipt from anywhere in the world, or that it would have legal effect, but maybe I am wrong. I'm sensitive about the form in question; I'll just say tha...
- Sat Dec 29, 2007 12:42 pm
- Forum: Canada / United States Tax & Accounting
- Topic: Proof of mailing
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6384
Proof of mailing
I have a possible issue with a lost form; it's been several months of waiting for answers from the IRS, and the answer will affect my next year's filing. I did file using Canadian registered mail, and I have the stamped receipt. According to the following from the IRS, a registered or certified mail...