Messed up my 8891

This is our main tax information forum which deals with topics concerning Canadians living and working in the U.S., U.S. citizens contemplating working in Canada, and all aspects of Canadian and U.S. income tax and related adminstrative issues.

Moderator: Mark T Serbinski CA CPA

tsanaha
Posts: 268
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 6:51 am

Post by tsanaha »

just wanted to say

Taxpayers have to pay $2000 to IRS for a private letter ruling from the IRS on top of a legal fee to tax lawyers who prepare a request of PLR.

So QD back files that have been used by many is far much better. Some may be concerned the possible audit after QD -- as there is no clear guide line from IRS that f8891 back file along with FBAR are good enough.

Someone has posted that RRSP had been even included as base for in lieu penalty (proxy of FBAR penalty inside OVDI). That is a big contrast compared both PLR and QD.

If (a big IF) IRS indeed wants to punish those who missed f8891/FBAR, then those QD back files may just be lucky sneaking into the system under the IRS radar.
YankNucks
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 1:14 pm

Post by YankNucks »

What does "QD" stand for?
tsanaha
Posts: 268
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 6:51 am

Post by tsanaha »

QD means quiet disclosure. You do amended return without alert IRS
YankNucks
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 1:14 pm

Post by YankNucks »

Great, thanks.
reiver416
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:18 pm

Post by reiver416 »

How does the amended return not alert the IRS? Is a letter with an explanation not advised?
tsanaha
Posts: 268
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 6:51 am

Post by tsanaha »

a letter of explanation of 1040X is not required. but later filing of FBAR is.

i guess most time it is the machine process -- so nobody at IRS would pay much attention on those QD
Post Reply